Ap World History 2010 Q3

demesne level 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES head word 3 Comparative BASIC gist (competence) 07 Points 1. Has acceptable dissertation. 1 Point The thesis moldinessiness include both a legal similarity and a valid difference in methods of semi governmental ascendence in two of the empires. The thesis must be pertinent to the time period, but the dates need non be explicit. The thesis must be explicitly stated in the introduction or the specified conclusion of the taste. The thesis may be as unmatched sentence or as multiple sentences. A thesis that is split among multiple splits or merely restates the prompt is unacceptable. The thesis CANNOT count for any other evince. 2. Addresses all(a) parts of the question, though not necessarily evenly or thoroughly. 2 Points For 2 dits Identifies at least one valid similarity and one valid difference in methods of political control. Discusses two empires but not necessarily evenly. For 1 point Identifies at least one valid similarity or at least one valid difference in methods of political control. Discusses two empires but not necessarily evenly. 3. Substantiates thesis with appropriate historical endorse. 2 Points For 2 points Must provide at least five particularised pieces of evidence (at least two from each empire). Evidence must be within the designated time periods (e. g. , evidence from the popish Republic or Qin dynasty is not acceptable). For 1 point Must provide at least terce specific pieces of evidence (at least one from each empire). Evidence must be within the designated time periods. 4. Makes at least one direct, relevant comparison among/among societies. 1 Point (The direct comparison may discuss either similarities or differences. ) To earn this point, the comparison must be made somewhere other than in the thesis. . Analyzes at least one reason for a similarity or a difference identify in a direct comparison. Analysis (reason why) must be related to a similarity or a diff erence in methods of political control between the two empires. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points 2010 The College plank. forebode the College Board on the blade www. collegeboard. com. AP WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 Comparative (continued) EXPANDED CORE (excellence) Expands beyond basic amount of money of 17 points. A student must earn 7 points in the basic core area before earning points in the expand core area. 02 PointsEx amples Has a clear, analytical and comprehensive thesis. Addresses all parts of the question thoroughly (as relevant) comparisons, chronology, causation, connections, themes, interactions, content. Provides ample historical evidence to maintain thesis. Relates comparisons to larger global context. Makes several direct, relevant comparisons between or among societies. systematically analyzes the causes and effects of relevant similarities and differences. Applies relevant knowledge of other regions or earth historical processes. Dis cusses change over time (e. g. changing methods of political control as the empires began to decline). Recognizes nuances within empires. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points 2010 The College Board. go done the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. scold the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board.Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. ollegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. AP WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 3 Overview The i ntent of the question was for students to charge two of the stipulated empires Han chinaware (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) and compare the ways those empires exerted political control over their populaces.Students were explicitly told to discuss both similarities and differences in methods of political control. Sample 3A Score 8 The canvas contains a valid thesis in the second and third sentences of the first divide (1 point). In the quaternary paragraph, the essay addresses a similarity (Both empires had unstable borders) and several differences, including However, Han chinaware dealt with the Turkic Huns through the tribute systems, thus placating them with gifts and avoiding costly & expensive warfare, which Rome preferred when dealing with their enemies (2 points).Although there is ample evidence for the Han, Roman evidence is limited by discussion of the Republic, which could not be counted. on that point is, however, enough evidence for 2 evidence points. In improver to the direct comparison listed above, there is another difference at the croupe of the second paragraph However, because there was less emphasis as a collective group in Rome, the political organization was a stripe less structured than Chinas which earned 1 point for the comparison and 1 point because the statement also involves an analysis.This essay contained a complex thesis, sufficient depth of comparison, and supporting evidence to earn 1 Expanded Core point. Sample 3B Score 6 This essay contains a valid thesis in the first paragraph (1 point) and addresses both similarities and differences (2 points). There is sufficient evidence for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han empires (2 points). The direct comparison is found in the second paragraph Han China and Maurya Gupta sic both consolidated their power through military buildup (1 point).The essay attempts analysis in the next t o the last paragraph but besides analyzes the Han Due to their lack of a devout religion, China was able to assimilate the Huns when they began to invade China. There is no analysis of a comparison of Han and Mauryan/Gupta methods of political control. Sample 3C Score 3 There is no valid thesis because the essay attempts to show a difference between Han and Rome in terms of the Roman Republic, which is outside the time period. The essay only addresses similarities, not valid differences (1 point).The evidence is sufficient for the Han, but the only valid piece of evidence for Rome is the statement that He Augustus discomfited Cleopatra and Mark Anthony making sure that Rome is politically secured (1 point). Most of the Roman evidence is prior to 31 B. C. E. and therefore did not earn credit. The essay has a valid direct comparison in the fourth paragraph The size of both empires was an issue that led to leaders ultimately losing political control of both empires (1 point). 2010 T he College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com.