Copper Mountain Essay -- Environmental Issues

Its a sunny October afternoon and Im listening to the breeze gently rustle the tree tops above me. I look down into the creek as I sit here munching on some cashews, and I see trout gliding effortlessly through the crystal-clear water. I revel in how incredibly lush the area isalthough its been a dry summer the ground is still moist, plants are bright and colorful, and wildlife is abound. After I finish my snack and tuck my trash away into my backpack, I continue my hike up this parcel of land that is may soon become needy with towers of steel and wire draping the landscape. I wonder to myself what will become of these fish, or the fresh clean water that runs into the Reeder Reservoir, the source of Ashlands drinking water.According to the environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ski area expansions are the most ecological damaging task that an area can undertake. In a plan alteration for the White River National Forest in Colorado, regarding the Copper Mountain Ski Resort expan sion, the EPA hammers that point home when they say that no other land guidance prescription on the Forest directly results in more swarm-water depletion, wetland impacts, air pollution, permanent vegetation change, or permanent habitat loss more wetland impacts and flow rate depletions resulted from ski area expansion and improvement than from all other Forest management activities combined, including many direct and indirect impacts that are permanent (irreversible and irretrievable). Meanwhile, skier numbers nationally have only increased just two percent since 1978(source). Which begs the question, why have ski area sizes more than doubled in acreage to the atmosphere of 107%(source)? Mt. Ashlands future expansion surely isnt needed due t... ...ts past development and expansion of the Copper Mountain ski area as major factor in the degradation of the watershed and local water quality. Impacts include increased peak flows, increased water temperature, increased erosion a nd repository transport, and decrease flow due to snowmaking activities. The USDA has taken exhaustive steps to help mitigate the damage caused by the expansion at a with child(p) financial cost to taxpayers. The USDA has had to redesign all stream crossings to allow for higher stream flows and to withstand expected floods. They also performed physical modifications of the stream patterns and stream geometry to improve long term stream health. Environmental ScorecardConcerned locals first brought attention to the Environmental Scorecard in November of 2008 after an article produce in the local newspaper, Ashland Daily Tidings, appeared.